The Waorani Won Their Amazon Oil Case. Then Block 22 Came Back.

The photo shows a row of Waorani elders and leaders in a plain courtroom in Ecuador's Amazon, fists raised, grinning. It's from 2019, and it captured one of the most celebrated Indigenous legal victories of the past decade.

The viral caption attached to it says an Amazon tribe won a lawsuit against Big Oil, saving millions of acres of rainforest. The win was real. But nearly every other detail in that sentence needs fixing: the Waorani sued their own government, not an oil company; the ruling covered about half a million acres, not millions; and seven years later, the same land is back in Ecuador's oil plans.

Here's what actually happened, and why the story isn't over.

Graphic: The Verified Post. Map data: Natural Earth via world-atlas. Locations approximate.

Who the Waorani are

The Waorani are an Indigenous people of Ecuador's Amazon. According to Ecuador's Constitutional Court, they were first contacted by the outside world only around half a century ago, and the Court has treated the Waorani of Pastaza as a "people of recent contact" deserving extra protection.

Their territory sits on top of something the Ecuadorian state badly wants: oil. Oil is one of Ecuador's biggest sources of revenue, and successive governments have tried to push drilling deeper into the southern Amazon.

The auction that started it

In 2012, Ecuador ran what it called a consultation with Indigenous communities in the south-central Amazon before dividing the region into oil blocks for an international auction. One of those blocks, Block 22, lay over Waorani land in Pastaza province.

The Waorani said that consultation was a sham. According to the court that later heard the case, as reported by Al Jazeera, meetings were called with too little notice, too few elders were present, there was no real dialogue, and there were no clear translations into the Waorani language. Community members testified that the meetings promoted oil extraction rather than explaining its risks.

Ecuador's constitution lets the state develop oil on Indigenous land, but it requires the communities affected to be properly consulted first: what's known as free, prior and informed consultation.

The lawsuit

On February 27, 2019, Ecuador's Ombudsman's Office, the Waorani organization of Pastaza and 16 Waorani communities filed a constitutional "protection action." The defendants weren't oil companies. They were the Ministry of Energy and Non-Renewable Natural Resources, the Ministry of Environment and the state attorney general's office. One of the lead plaintiffs was Nemonte Nenquimo, the Waorani leader who helped organize the case.

The hearing opened in April 2019, and on April 26 a three-judge panel in Pastaza ruled for the Waorani: the 2012 consultation had violated their collective rights to self-determination and prior consultation. The written judgment followed on May 9, ordering the state to repeat the consultation properly if it wanted to proceed. The judges did not find a violation of the rights of nature, because no oil activity had yet begun.

The government appealed. On July 11, 2019, Pastaza's provincial court rejected the appeal, upheld the ruling, extended it to more Waorani communities, and ordered officials to be trained and investigated.

The ruling covered Block 22, which spans roughly 180,000 hectares, or about half a million acres. That's the figure used by the Goldman Environmental Prize, which honored Nenquimo in 2020; that same year she was named to TIME's list of the 100 most influential people.

What the viral post gets wrong

"Against Big Oil." No oil company was a defendant. The case targeted the state's consultation process before any company had been awarded the block.

"Millions of acres." The ruling protected roughly half a million acres. The "millions" may come from a related figure: the government's plans for the region covered 16 oil blocks spanning more than 7 million acres of Indigenous territory, and campaigners argued the precedent could affect all of it. But the court's order applied to Block 22.

"Saving." The ruling didn't ban oil drilling in Waorani territory forever. It voided the 2012 consultation and required a proper one before any new auction. Personally, I think this is the detail that matters most, because it's exactly where the story picks up again.

Photo: Diego Tirira / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0.

Seven years later: back on the table

The case went on to Ecuador's Constitutional Court, which selected it in 2020 to set national precedent. In August 2025, ruling on a separate complaint that the 2019 judgments hadn't been carried out, the Court found that the order to repeat the consultation couldn't currently be enforced, because the government had no active plan to auction Block 22; that the training of officials was only partly done; and that the deadline to discipline the officials responsible had passed. It stressed that the state would still have to consult the Waorani properly before any future project.

Then, on November 13, 2025, the Court issued its main ruling in the case, setting binding national standards for consultation with peoples of recent contact. Consultation must aim at consent, be culturally appropriate and in good faith, and the state must be willing to change or cancel a project in response. But the majority also held that, in exceptional cases and with reinforced justification, the state can still proceed without consent. A dissenting opinion argued that for recently contacted peoples, it should not be able to.

Meanwhile, the oil plans came back. In 2026, Ecuador announced new licensing rounds for the south-central Amazon and sub-Andean region, with a tender expected to open in December 2026 covering 18 blocks, according to the Ecuadorian outlet El Oriente. Waorani leaders and the outlet Mongabay report that Block 22 is included. In July 2026, Waorani communities told an Ombudsman's hearing in Daipare that they reject oil activity in the block, and accused the state of ignoring the 2019 rulings.

So the Waorani did win, and it mattered: it forced a government to admit that a box-ticking meeting isn't consent, and it gave other Amazonian nations a precedent. What the viral caption misses is that in the Amazon, a court victory is rarely the end of the fight. It's usually just the round you won.

Read next: Greenland's IUD scandal: Denmark is now paying the women it wronged · The Navajo First Laugh Ceremony · How whooping cranes learned to migrate by following costumed pilots